Why the Gentry?

The 17th century saw many Scots resettle in Ireland, particularly in the northernmost province of Ulster.  This migration was driven by a series of events throughout that century, including:

  • The privately-financed settlement of Scots in Counties Antrim and Down engineered by Hugh Montgomery and James Hamilton in 1606.
  • The royally-sanctioned Ulster Plantation, which covered most of the rest of Ulster, starting in 1609.
  • The conclusion of the Wars of the Three Kingdoms in 1653, after which many Scottish Covenanter soldiers stationed in Ireland chose to remain.
  • The conclusion of the Williamite War in the 1690s, at which time famine in Scotland and cheap rents in Ireland caused many Scots to relocate.

Among the Scottish settlers who came to Ireland were numerous Colquhouns.  Exactly how many we cannot say since we have to assume that many were tenant farmers and tradesmen who went largely unrecorded, or at least are underrepresented in surviving records.

This post focuses on the wealthier minority of Irish Colhoun families.  Although ancestrally Scottish, they would have been considered part of the Anglo-Irish elite, the so-called Protestant Ascendancy that dominated political, legal, and economic life in Ireland until the reforms of the mid-19th century.  Being in the good graces of the Crown, they belonged to the Church of Ireland, the state-sanctioned Anglican church that held most of the ecclesiastical power and property in Ireland.  Although none of the wealthier Calhouns (whether in Scotland, Ireland, or elsewhere) ever made it to the peerage (the highest tier of British nobility), they did belong to the gentry (wealthy, land-owning commoners eligible for coats of arms, with titles ranging from “Gentleman” to “Baronet”; see here for descriptions).  

You might ask, If these guys were the minority, why focus so much attention on them?  Don’t the rich get enough resources already?  The fact is that from the 17th to early 19th centuries, the Calhouns of Ireland most often recorded in surviving documents were those of the Irish gentry:  they bought and sold land, acted as landlords on estate records, appeared in court proceedings, petitioned the Crown, left wills, etc.  As a result, these families tend to have relatively long paper trails.  Tenant farmers also appeared in rental records, but in general these appearances were fewer and farther between, making their families harder to trace.

The long paper trails of the Irish gentry can be genealogically useful not only to members of those families themselves, but also to the rest of us.  Using Y-DNA genetic information, we can often estimate when the most recent common patrilineal ancestor of two Calhoun men lived.  If the first of those men has a long paper trail, perhaps because he is a descendant of the gentry, and if the second man shares a common ancestor with the first during the timeframe of that trail, then the second man might reasonably assume that some of his own ancestors appear in the pedigree of the first.

These relatively long paper trails also mean that if any Irish Calhoun family might be traced back to Scotland, it would be one of the gentry.  Furthermore, there was not a lot of room for upward social mobility in Britain in the 17th and 18th centuries, so I have to assume that the Colhouns of the Irish gentry were descended from Colquhouns of the Scottish gentry.  (Some Irish families did initially acquire land through military service rather than by purchase, but I tend to think that most soldiers receiving larger Irish land grants were military officers––who again tended to come from wealthier families––rather than foot soldiers.)  Thanks in part to the work of Sir William N. Fraser, many of the Colquhoun families of the Scottish gentry have the benefit of a relatively solid pedigree back to Humphrey of Kilpatrick, the 13th century founder of the family.  If we could join ourselves to the Irish gentry, and the Irish gentry to the Scottish gentry, we might be able to trace our Calhoun lineages back to the year 1240.  Wishful thinking, of course, but we have to try, don’t we?

Although there was limited upward social mobility in centuries past, there was certainly downward mobility.  Those who were financially unsuccessful, or were younger sons of younger sons that did not inherit much, could fall out of the gentry class.  Those of us with Irish Calhoun ancestry who do not have long paper trails (i.e., most of us) might be descendants of working-class Colquhouns who came to Ireland as tenants, or we might just as easily be descendants of Irish gentry families who for whatever reason eventually lost title and property.  With enough Y-DNA data, we may eventually be able to distinguish between these two scenarios, at least in certain cases.

Below are brief descriptions of the distinct Colhoun families of the Irish gentry that I have been able to identify so far.  (I use the spelling “Colhoun” because all of them came from western Ulster where that spelling predominated, as opposed to eastern Ulster, where “Cahoon” and “Cohoon” were more common.)  In Scotland, the senior Colquhoun families were styled (at least by Fraser) by the principal property they owned, like “Colquhoun of Luss”, “Colquhoun of Camstradden”, “Colquhoun of Kilmardinny”, etc.  In Ireland, I have not seen this tradition used as consistently, or at least not in a hereditary fashion, so I have had to make up my own titles to describe these families.  Previous posts discussed Colquhoun of Corkagh.  I will devote future posts to each of the other families in turn, but for now, I simply want to enumerate them.

Selected properties held by the families Colquhoun of Corkagh (orange), Colhoun of Crosh (magenta), Colhoun of Taughboyne (green), Colhoun of Letterkenny (blue), Colhoun of Tironeill (yellow), and Colhoun of Labbadish (red). (Source: interactive parish map at http://www.johngrenham.com; used with permission.)

Colquhoun of Corkagh

Corkagh was an estate, located in parish Raymoghy, Co. Donegal, that was created in 1610 as part of the original Plantation of Ulster.  Alexander Colquhoun, 15th/17th of Luss purchased this property from his nephew, Sir Walter Stewart of Minto, in the 1610s.  The two previous posts concerning the history of this property mention that those of the family who actually lived in Ireland included just two generations from the male line:  Alexander’s grandsons James Colquhoun (later 19th/21st of Luss) and Alexander Colquhoun (later 1st of Tillyquhoun) from the first generation, and James’s son Capt. James Colquhoun of Manorcunningham from the second.  This is the only family of the Irish gentry for which we know the Scottish founder with certainty [WOOHOO!].  However, it is also one where the male line quickly died out, precluding its participation in Y-DNA comparisons [D’OH!]

Colhoun of Crosh

This family can be traced back to about 1630 to the area around Newtownstewart, a village in parish Ardstraw, Co. Tyrone.  Around 1725, the senior member of the family, William Colhoun, acquired property in the townlands of Crosh and Croshballinree, just outside Newtownstewart, and Crosh is the place name most commonly associated with the family.  However, many family members lived elsewhere in western Tyrone and Donegal, notably Rev. Alexander Colhoun Sr. (1663-1719), one of several Church of Ireland ministers in the family.

One might be forgiven for thinking that the Colhouns of Crosh were the only Calhoun family living in Ireland in the 1700s.  This is because until recently, many if not most Calhouns with Irish origins claimed descent from this family, particularly from the above-mentioned Rev. Alexander Colhoun Sr.  It seems that virtually every Calhoun immigrant to America born within 20 years of 1700 was stated to have been a son of Rev. Alexander.  Thanks to widespread availability of more records and to Y-DNA genetic testing, we now know that in most cases this is simply not true.

Y-DNA haplogroups associated with this family are MF104747 for select members, and its parental haplogroup, FT350465, for the entire family.

Colhoun of Taughboyne

The Colhouns of Taughboyne included several lawyers and clerks as well as John Colhoun (d. 1755), the estate agent for the Earl of Abercorn in the 1740s and 1750s.  The family originated in parish Taughboyne, Co. Donegal about 1665, and the senior members owned the townland of Corncammon (aka Corncamble) in the adjacent parish of Allsaints.  However, the family was also associated with Buncrana and Carnamoyle on the Inishowen Peninsula, Strabane in Co. Tyrone, Dublin, and other places.

In Our Calhoun Family, Orval Calhoun states that the John Colhoun (d. 1755) mentioned above was a son of Rev. Alexander Colhoun Sr. of Crosh (as was every other Calhoun, it seems!)  However, the Y-DNA haplogroup associated with the Colhoun of Taughboyne family is BY153907, which originated early in the Ulster Plantation years.  The Crosh family is negative for BY153907, which indicates the Crosh and Taughboyne families were descendants of different Ulster settlers from Scotland.  Nonetheless, due to the popularity of Orval’s books, the misconception that they were a single Irish family persists to the present day. 

Colhoun of Letterkenny

This family, associated with the town of Letterkenny (parish Conwal) and the townland of Carrickballydooey (parish Raymoghy), both in Co. Donegal, was the subject of an entry in A Genealogical and Heraldic History of the Landed Gentry of Ireland (Sir Bernard Burke and A. C. Fox-Davies.  London: Harrison & Sons, 1912, p. 121).  The article traces the family to John Colhoun and Susanna Leslie, who lived in the early 18th century.  It seems that with each generation after about 1750, the family produced only a single male heir, inevitably named Charles.  Unfortunately, as best I can tell, this male line of Charleses came to an end in 1972 with the death in London of Charles K. Colhoun, a literary scholar and translator.  Unfortunately, unless other members can be identified, we will have no Y-DNA information about this family.

Colhoun of Tironeill

This family held property in parish Clonleigh, Co. Donegal, including the townland of Tironeill and the estate of Bullock House in Boyagh, as well as the townland of Lisanelly, parish Cappagh, Co. Tyrone.  They have been traced as far as a Robert Colhoun Sr. who was probably born in the mid-1700s.

I confess I’m cheating a bit here.  Y-DNA results show this family belongs to haplogroup FTA80569, which is a subgroup of BY153907.  Because BY153907 originated around the time of the Ulster Plantation, it appears likely that the Colhouns of Tironeill are a branch of the Colhouns of Taughboyne; however, the connection between the two families has not (yet) been documented.

Colhoun of Labbadish

The townland of Labbadish is adjacent to Carrickballydooey in parish Raymoghy, Co. Donegal, so it is possible that this family is in fact a branch of the Colhouns of Letterkenny described above.  However, there is as yet no documentary or genetic proof of this, and no one from this family has participated in the Colhoun Y-DNA Project as of yet.

It is also not clear whether every Colhoun from Labbadish was part of the same family.  Early “members” include John Colhoun, Esq. of Labbadish, born about 1740; and William Colhoun, Esq. of Green Cottage in Labbadish, born about 1777.  How they and others from that area were related, if at all, is not clear.

Conclusion

From the records I have seen, all of the Calhouns living in Ireland in the 17th-19th centuries who appear to have had money, title, or land can be connected to one of the six families mentioned above.  However, the records I have seen are limited, so there could well have been others.  These families tended to marry within their own social class, and marriage contracts often involved the acquisition or exchange of land rights with spouses’ families.  The map above shows the result of this process after several generations, with land holdings of members of the same gentry family sometimes extending to different parishes and different counties.

In a previous post, I mentioned that Y-DNA data indicated that Calhoun testers of Irish ancestry from haplogroup E-Y16733 were descended from as many as seven Scottish Colquhoun settlers of Ireland.  Additional testing since that post was written (July 2023) suggests an eighth settler.  At least two of these settlers had descendants among the six gentry families above.  In addition, Calhouns from two non-E haplogroups (R1b1a2_N and J2) also have Irish ancestry.  Both of these groups likely arose through NPEs, and it is not yet known whether they arose before or after the 17th century settlement of Ireland by Scots.  As always, Y-DNA testing of more Irish Calhouns may help to give us a clearer picture.

Are you aware of other Calhouns of the Irish gentry who cannot be connected with one of the families above?  Can you shed any light on the relationships between these families?  If so, I’d love to hear from you!

*****

Thanks again to John Grenham for the use of the map from his website, and once again, thanks to Paul Calhoun for critical reading of this post and helpful edits.

*****

© 2024 Brian Anton. All rights reserved.

*****

11 thoughts on “The Colhouns of the Irish Gentry

  1. I love your work, but would suggest we keep an open mind that BY153907 is the haplogroup that represents Rev. Alex. Extensive autosomal work is not indicating that. The will of Rev. Alex.’s son William dated 1756 lists only 3 sons of Rev. Alex and names their order. Crosh House eventually was only passed down through a female descendant indicating there were no male relatives of that female left to inherit or contest it. I cannot find good proof that Robert Hazlett Colhoun descends from him.

    We know, thanks to you, to be very wary of “The Descent and Alliances of Croslegh”, but his notes field for Robert Hazlett Colhoun says that he tried to get his father and Aunt to tell him about his ancestry, and they both skirted the issue. He was definitely raised by the family he is attributed to because of the visits by his supposed siblings and nephew. It’s an interesting mystery that I’m sure you could shed light on.

    Thank you for all your research and insight!

    Like

  2. Excuse me. I copied down the wrong haplogroup. It’s E-MF104747 that does not have any triangulations with primary documented descendants of Rev. Alexander. My comment above applies to either haplogroup actually. Thank you for you kindness in overlooking that error.

    Like

  3. I have a further refinement upon rechecking “The Descent and Alliances of Croslegh”. In his note section, it states it’s the children of Robert Hazlett Colhoun who asked him and Robert H.’s sister about their ancestry. Neither would tell them anything. Some of these are children that Croslegh seems to have been referring to when getting correspondence from the family for his research. I look forward to my continued perusal of your outstanding research.

    Like

    1. Many thanks for your comments! I’m preparing some future posts on the Colhoun of Crosh group, but at the risk of getting ahead of myself, I would say that on the contrary, E-MF104747 is the terminal Y-DNA haplogroup of the *only* tester with a solid paper trail back to Rev. Alexander Sr. Autosomal results can be muddied by hidden relationships we’re unaware of, and there was a lot of intermarriage within a relatively small population of Irish gentry.

      The tester is indeed a descendant through Robert Hazlitt Colhoun, as you mentioned. My reading of Croslegh’s note on p. 225 is that after immigrating to the US, Robert himself was reluctant to share “information about their family” (of what nature Croslegh doesn’t say) with his children, particularly his son Charles. However, Charles knew enough to have the address in Ireland of his aunt Isabella Barclay, since Croslegh tells us he wrote her a letter. So whatever information Robert was reluctant to share, he did not withhold the names of at least some of his relatives, allowing us to connect him with the family at Sixmilecross. Robert’s middle name, Hazlitt, would also seem to connect him with his grandmother, Margaret nee Hazlitt.

      Which parts of Robert Hazlitt Colhoun’s pedigree to Rev. Alexander are you doubtful of?

      Like

    2. My apologies, I think I misunderstood the concern in your comments. You may not doubt Robert H.’s paper trail, but because of his reluctance to share certain information with his son (as Croslegh tells it), you wonder if his biological ancestry might not reflect that paper trail. Is that right?

      If so, my feeling is that there is no reason to doubt that his Y-DNA haplogroup reflects his “on-paper” ancestry. His terminal haplogroup, E-MF104747, is derived from BY5775, the parental haplogroup from which all E-group Calhouns belong. In other words, his biological ancestry is squarely within the Calhoun genetic tree.

      Implicit in my analysis of Y-DNA of this family is the assumption that there are no NPEs in the ancestry of Calhouns from BY5775. To think otherwise is to imagine an NPE with a distant Calhoun relative of the presumed father. While not totally impossible, such a scenario makes my head spin! I’d have to have pretty strong evidence for it, and the vague comments in Croslegh’s note simply don’t rise to this level, IMHO.

      Like

      1. Thank you for your reply. Yes, I, like you, expected the tester who is a descendant of Robert Hazlitt Calhoun to be the group that represented Rev. Alex. Yes, because that tester’s haplogroup goes back through E-BY5775, he is a verified Colquhoun male line descendant. Where I find the problem is that I do have another, strong paper trail, via Rev. Alex’s descendant, Isabella Colhoun, d. of Capt. Charles Colhoun, grd. of Alex. Colhoun Jr., and gr. grd of Rev. Alex. Her descendants consistently triangulate with males who represent haplogroup E-BY165188. I have not yet been able to find any triangulation from Robert Hazlitt Calhoun descendants to any of the Colquhoun males after a 1000 plus comparisons. I hope to in the future. I will be emailing you some technical info on that. In any case, because even the Aunt that Robert’s son wrote who also skirted the issue, I would suggest the verdict needs to remain undecided on this particular branch. You might be interested in knowing that out of these E-BY165188 males though, there is not one solid verified line back through Rev. Alex. I would also suggest that none of them are direct descendants of Rev. Alexander as their cM’s shared are smaller in size than with triangulations that only they have with William Colhoun born around 1635. We do agree that Rev. Alexander is NOT the progenitor of most American lines. I simply haven’t found proof that he is the progenitor of any of them currently. Could the fact that Rev. Alexander’s properties eventually descended through a female descendant, indicate there were no male descendants by then also?

        Liked by 1 person

      2. Thanks for sharing this! However, for Robert Hazlitt’s results to NOT represent his great-grandfather Rev. Alex’s, we’d have to imagine an NPE with another, distantly related Colhoun in the generations between, which seems highly unlikely. While Isabella’s results are definitely worth investigating, they are much less direct a measure when trying to determine Rev. Alex’s Y-DNA haplotype, and I have too many questions about it at this point. I agree that BY165188 and its parental group, BY164498, are from an independent Irish (?) group from the one Rev. Alex belongs to, so I’m not surprised that they have no genealogical link to him. The fact that you find Isabella’s descendants to be linked to Calhouns from that group is very interesting though, and I’m happy to talk further about it.

        Like

  4. As for Isabella Colhoun, 1795-1863, spouse of John Barclay, she is listed as the daughter of Charles in the Belfast Newsletter when she marries. Charles is listed as the son of Alexander (II by timing) in the following info. 

    “Shared by michaelgbarr525 on Ancestry: “3Memorial 267921, volume 404, page 258, image 141.
    Deed dated: 3 Nov 1772. Deed registered: 16 Apr 1789.

    Margin: Colhoun to Colhoun & an[other]. Reg[istere]d 16 april 1789 at 11 in forenoon.

    Header: To the Register appointed by act of Parliament for Regist[rin]g Deeds, Wills etc.

    A Memorial of Indented articles of agreement bearing date the third day of November one thousand seven hundred and Seventy two and made between the Rev[eren]d Alex[ande]r Colhoun of Six mile Cross in the County of Tyrone, Clerke & Cha[rle]s Colhoun, Gent[leman], Younger son of the said Alexander Colhoun of the first part; James Anderson of Six mile Cross aforesaid, Gentleman, for and on behalf of Mary Anderson, a Minor under the age of Twenty one years, Dau[ghte]r and only child of the said James Anderson [of the second part;] and Alexander Colhoun of Omagh, Esq[uire], and the Rev[eren]d Math[e]w Galbraith of Thilletter, Cl[er]ke, both in the County of Tyrone of the third part; Reciting that a marriage was then Shortly Intended to be had between the said Charles Colhoun and Mary Anderson and further Reciting as therein is Recited which s[ai]d articles Witnessed that in Consid[eratio]n of a marriage portion of Two hundred pounds ster[ling] paid or secured to be paid by said James Anderson he the said Cha[rle]s Colhoun with said Mary Anderson, his Intended wife, and in order to procure a Competint provision for Said Mary in Case She Should Survive her Intended husband they the said Alexander Colhoun, the Elder and Charles Colhoun did Grant Bargain and Sell unto the said Alexander Colhoun, the Younger and Math[e]w Galbraith All That and those the House and Office Houses in the Town of Strabane then Last in the pos[ses]sion of Charles Kinkead, Merchant, the House and Tenem[en]t in the said Town of Strabane in the pos[ses]sion of John Stewart Hamilton, Esq[uire], from and Immediately after the Decease of Judith Gordon, Widow, that House and Tenem[en]t in the Town of Enniskillen then in the pos[ses]sion of John Ball, Distiller, and also the House Tenem[en]t and presm[is]es in the Town of Six mile Cross then in the pos[ses]sion of the said Alex[ande]r Colhoun, the Elder, with all and singular the Appur[tenan]ces thereunto belonging To hold unto the said Alexander Colhoun, the Younger, and Mathew Galbraith and the Surviv[o]rs and Survivor of them and the Heirs, Exe[cuto]rs and Adm[inistrato]rs of such Survivor forever to the uses, Trusts, intents and purposes therein par[ticu]larly ment[ione]d and no other and by which said Deed of which this is a Memorial the said Alexander Colhoun, the Elder, and James Anderson for themselves and Each them did Severlly Covenant, promise and agree to and with [End of page 258 and the beginning of page 259]

    The said Charles Colhoun, his Heirs, Executors and Adm[inistrato]rs that all such fortune and Estate real or personal as the said Alex[ande]r Colhoun, the Elder, and Ja[me]s Anderson Should thereafter be possed of Should after the Decease of them the said Alex[ande]r Colhoun the Elder and James Anderson and their Respective Wivees Marg[re]t Colhoun and Sophia Anderson, Descend to the said Cha[rle]s Colhoun and Mary, his Intended wife, and the issue between them to be begotten which said Deed is witnessed by Francis Johnston of Cooly and James Rouse of Omagh both in the County of Tyrone and this Memorial is witnessed by the said James Rouse and Elizabeth Rouse, his wife, this tenth day of april one thousand seven hundred and Eighty nine Cha[rle]s Colhoun (seal).

    Signed and Sealed in presence of James Rousse, Eliz[abeth] Rousse. The above named Ja[me]s Rousse maketh Oath that he was present and saw the Deed of which the above writing is a Memorial duly Executed by the said Alexander Colhoun, the Edw[ard] Cha[rle]s Colhoun and James Anderson and also saw the above Memorial duly Executed by the above named Cha[rle]s Colhoun and Dep[onen]t sayth he is a Sub[scribin]g witness to said Deed and Mem[oria]l and that the Name James Rousse Severally Signed to said Deed and Memorial is this Dep[onen]ts proper name and handwriting. James Rousse sworn before me at Strabane in the County of Tyrone the 11 day of April 1789 by virtue of a Comm[issio]n to me Directed out of his Ma[jes]ties Court of Kings Bench in Ireland for taking aff[idavi]ts in said County and I know the Deponant. Edward Lynch.”

    Alexander II is listed as the 3rd son of Rev. Alexander Colhoun b. abt 1662 in the will of his brother, William, who died in 1756.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment