The Origin of the Calhoun Family

The Calhoun name originated in Scotland, where it was typically spelled Colquhoun and pronounced “ca-HOON”.  As the family spread to Ireland, America, and elsewhere, the name Colquhoun was shortened to Colhoun, Calhoun, Calhoon, Cahoon, and other forms.  In America, the most common spelling is Calhoun, and so being an American myself, that is how I will refer to the family generally in this blog.

The surname is derived from a place name:  the lands of Colquhoun (a Gaelic word of uncertain origin but often translated as “narrow woods”), located in the parish of Old Kilpatrick in Dunbartonshire, Scotland.  As in many parts of Europe, the earliest Scottish surnames were adopted by wealthy landowners who often called themselves after lands in their possession.  The surname Colquhoun was of this type, first adopted by a man formerly called Humphrey of Kilpatrick.  After receiving the lands of Colquhoun by charter from Maldouen, third Earl of Lennox, he afterwards re-styled himself after his new holdings, Humphrey of Colquhoun.

Map of Scotland showing the location of Dunbartonshire and the parish of Old Kilpatrick.
Left: the counties of Scotland in 1947, showing the location of the county of Dunbarton (boxed). Right: closeup of the boxed region, showing the approximate location of the lands or barony of Colquhoun (red bar), which lay along the northeast bank of the River Clyde in the parish of Old Kilpatrick. (Source: modified from “Scotland Administrative Map 1947.png” by XrysD. Creative Commons license CC BY-SA 3.0.)

The charter was translated from the original Latin to English by Sir William Fraser, who then included it in his book on the Colquhoun family.  For some reason, Fraser opted not to translate Humphrey’s name from the Latinized version, Umfridus de Kilpatrick, as it was written in the charter.  As a result, many people still refer to Humphrey as “Umfridus” even though that’s almost certainly not how he would have referred to himself.  Fraser’s translation of the charter reads: 

To all his friends, and men present and to come, Maldouen Earl of Lennox, greeting:  Let all men present and to come know, that I have given, granted, and by this present charter have confirmed to Umfridus de Kilpatrick the whole land of Colquhoun, by its right divisions, with all its just pertinents, to be held by him and his heirs of me and my heirs in feu and heritage, freely, quietly, fully and honorably, in wood and plain, in meadows and pastures, in pools and mills, in fishings, and in all other easements belonging to the foresaid lands; he and his heirs rendering therefrom to me and my heirs the third part of the service of one knight for every service and exaction; before these witnesses, Sir Walter, Steward of our Lord the King, Malcolm my son, Gillaspec Galbraith, Hamelyn, Malcolm, Duncan, my brothers, Malcolm Beg, Doven my chamberlain, Fergus Makcomyng, and many others.

Fraser vol. 1, pp. 4-5.  Original Latin text in Fraser vol. 2, p. 272.

Several important and interesting facts about the family can be determined from this one document.

First, the Calhoun family originated in the first half of the 13th century.  No date appears in the charter, but Maldouen ruled as earl from roughly 1220 to 1250, and the first witness, Walter Stewart, third High Steward of Scotland, died in 1246, so the charter must have been written between about 1220 and 1246.  Fraser estimates that Humphrey lived about 1190-1260, with the charter written about 1240, and these seem to me like reasonable guesses.

Second, the Calhoun family originated with a name change from Kilpatrick to Colquhoun.  According to Fraser, little or nothing is known about Humphrey of Kilpatrick’s ancestry (see Fraser vol. 1, pp. 3-4).  However, if Humphrey had brothers or cousins who retained the name Kilpatrick, the closest relatives of the earliest Colquhouns would have been Kilpatricks or Kirkpatricks.  (Kilpatrick and Kirkpatrick are two forms of the same name, both meaning “church of St. Patrick”.  Kilpatrick is the Gaelic cognate, and Kirkpatrick is the Scots cognate.)  This will be important when we consider genealogical genetic testing results in a future post.

Third, the Colquhoun surname probably originated only once, at least in medieval times, and that is with the land charter above.  Like those of many countries, Scottish surnames could be derived from a father’s given name, from an occupation, from a nickname pertaining to a personal characteristic, from a topographical feature of the place where a person lived, or from a specific place name.  Names derived from a father’s given name (like Williamson or MacDonald) often were adopted by many people independently, since there were many people with the same given name (like William or Donald).  The same is true of occupations and personal characteristics, which can be shared by many people, or topographical features (brooks, trees, mountains, etc.), which can be found in many places.  Even some place names are not unique, again leading to independent adoption of the same name.  (For example, there are several churches in Scotland dedicated to St. Patrick, meaning there could have been several unrelated families by the name of Kilpatrick or Kirkpatrick.)  However, the place name Colquhoun is, as far as I know, unique to the lands in Dunbartonshire that were granted to Humphrey.  As a consequence, the family name Colquhoun is probably unique to Humphrey’s descendants.

Fourth, the founder of the family, Humphrey, was probably of Anglo-Norman, Flemish, or French ancestry.  Why?  For one thing, the given name Humphrey was not Scots or Gaelic in origin, but rather was introduced to Britain by the Normans in the 11th century.  For another, Humphrey of Kilpatrick appears to have been a knight, given that he was to render knight service to the earl as part of the deal for the land.  Knights in Scotland at that time were typically of Anglo-Norman or French extraction.

King David I of Scotland introduced sweeping reforms during his reign (1124-1153), the so-called Davidian Revolution.  He remade the Scottish government over in the style of Anglo-Norman England, and in doing so introduced French language and customs to the Scottish court.  He also introduced feudalism to Scotland.  However, instead of building the feudal hierarchy around Gaelic clan chiefs, whose primary loyalties were to kin, he instead imported French, Flemish, and Anglo-Norman knights as a new feudal class, loyal to himself.  Humphrey of Kilpatrick was probably a descendant of one of these imported knights.

The Colquhouns as a Scottish Clan

The clans of medieval Scotland were socio-political structures that developed in the heavily Gaelic Highlands.  Each clan was associated with a specific territory and named for the dominant family in that territory, the head of which was known as the chief of the clan.  From a genealogical perspective, it is important to note that membership in a clan was based on pledged loyalty to the dominant family and not necessarily on blood relationship to it.  To wit, starting in the 15th century, when commoners in Scotland began to adopt surnames, tenant farmers and other residents of a clan’s territory often took the surname of the clan chief, even when not related to him.  (See here for an excellent discussion of clans.) 

How do the Colquhouns fit with this traditional clan model?  The Colquhoun family’s medieval possessions, located in Old Kilpatrick and near Luss and Loch Lomond, are situated virtually on top of the Highland Boundary Fault, and so the Colquhouns are sometimes described as Highlanders and other times as Lowlanders.  If Humphrey of Kilpatrick, as I argue, was of Flemish or Norman extraction, most probably, he neither spoke Gaelic nor followed Gaelic customs.  However, his Colquhoun descendants likely became an admixture of different ethnicities through intermarriage with Gaels and other groups.  In doing so, the family evolved from its foreign, feudal origin to become a recognized Scottish clan despite being neither definitively Highlanders nor purely Gaelic. 

Left: the clan territories of the Scottish highlands as they were in 1587-1594, with the boxed region indicating the same territory as on the modern map above. Right: closeup of the boxed region, showing the approximate territory of the Colquhoun clan (blue). It is interesting to note that by this time, the original barony of Colquhoun (marked on the modern map) had passed out of the family’s control. The dotted line running through Dumbarton marks the Highland Boundary Fault. (Source: “Historical Geography of the Clans of Scotland,” by Thomas Brumby Johnston and James A. Robertson (1899), scan from Wikimedia Commons.)

At the risk of getting ahead of myself, genetic genealogical data suggests that most Calhouns today are the literal descendants of Humphrey of Kilpatrick.  Although I cannot rule it out entirely, I see little evidence of widespread adoption of the Colquhoun name by unrelated “commoners” in the clan’s territory in the 15th century.  Why this was the case, I don’t know.  Could it be due to the family’s non-Gaelic origins, or that this practice was less common near the border with the Lowlands?  I intend to devote upcoming posts to the genetic results, but for now I leave it to others who know Scottish history better than I do to speculate.

*****

Special thanks to Paul Calhoun for critical reading of this post and helpful edits.

*****

© 2023 Brian Anton. All rights reserved.

*****

In Search of the Calhouns

I’ve been researching my own ancestors for many years now. One ancestor who has always particularly fascinated me is Mary Calhoon, who was born near Cookstown, Northern Ireland and immigrated to the US as a teenager in the 1880s.  As an Irish Protestant with a Scottish name, Mary was undoubtedly a descendant of a Scottish man named Colquhoun who settled in the northern Irish province of Ulster sometime in the 1600s.  My search for Mary’s ancestors has led me to explore the Calhoun family, particularly those in Ireland, more broadly.

Mary Calhoon (1870-1900), circa 1892.
Mary Calhoon (1870-1900)

I’m certainly not the first person to do this, and there are plenty of other books, articles, blogs, and websites out there on the topic of the Calhoun family.  So why should I add another one?  Two reasons.  The first is that the story of this family is complicated, and I’m hoping that putting together posts on specific topics will help me clarify my thoughts and put my own research on as solid a footing as I can.  Although I’m doing it for myself, perhaps this exercise might prove useful to others also.

The second is that others out there might be in possession of a missing piece that could help solve a puzzle.  The most important thing that could come out of this blog is a reader’s contribution of evidence that I have not found, and I certainly hope that happens.  If you have evidence or source material that bears upon something I say––whether it proves me right or wrong––by all means let me know.

Throughout the course of this blog, I will try to explain why I think the way I do, and to back up my statements with evidence from source documents.  Not all sources are created equal, and I believe it is important to assess not only what a source is saying, but how likely it is to be correct.  Was it written around the time an event occurred?  Was the source’s author likely to have had first-hand knowledge of the events?  Is it derivative of other sources?  Did the author have any motive to embellish or fabricate?  These are all important questions that lead to a better understanding of our Calhoun ancestors and their lives.

As with any family that has been around as long as the Calhouns have, there is a lot of unsubstantiated family lore that is rarely questioned in any serious way.  It is my hope that this blog will do just that. Some of this family lore may end up being supported by evidence, some may be refuted, and some may not be addressed by evidence at all, in which case there is no reason to think it is either correct or incorrect. 

I believe that most of us who develop a passion for genealogy and family history do so because we want to discover and understand our ancestors. Whether my own ancestors were rich or poor, famous or obscure, they were the real-life forebears who made me who I am, and I feel I would be doing a disservice to them if I did not make every effort to get their names and their stories correct.  I’m guessing that most of you feel the same way and would like to set the record straight.  So let the search begin, and let’s see where it leads.

*****

ABOUT THE AUTHOR, Brian Anton.  I’m an amateur genealogist and have been researching my own roots since the 1990s.  While I’m not a professional, I do like to get the story right, and I hope my efforts help others as well.  The Calhouns are just some of my ancestors, but due to the depth of their history and the rich sources of information about them that have survived the centuries, they have been especially interesting to me.  While I’d like to think I have learned something about genealogy, I’m completely out of my depth when it comes to publishing on the web, so bear with me!

*****

Special thanks to Paul Calhoun for critical reading of this post and helpful edits.

*****

© 2023 Brian Anton. All rights reserved.

*****